It is often said that Satoshi Nakamoto should be awarded the Nobel Prize in Economics for the invention of bitcoin—the first absolutely scarce digital asset that solves the double-spend problem and allows anyone for the first time to transmit value rather than just information digitally. (For those who like precision, there is actually no Nobel Prize in economics. It is The Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel, which was established after Alfred Nobel’s death and is awarded according to the same principles as the Nobel Prizes.)
Sadly, the Nobel Prize has not been forthcoming (yet!) for Satoshi. This is the time of year when Nobel Prizes are announced, and that led me to wish for the establishment of a Nobel Prize in Bitcoin. Logically, Satoshi would be the first winner. But who would be the winner for 2024?
I’ve read many books about bitcoin and bitcoin history and have even spent a good bit of time poring over the forums where Satoshi introduced his invention to the world. Even so, I don’t have a comprehensive view of the history of bitcoin. So I did what we all do when we need a more comprehensive perspective on a subject. I asked ChatGPT.
How are Nobel Prizes chosen? They are awarded to those who, during the preceding year, have conferred the greatest benefit to humanity in the area of the prize. This time restriction creates a very narrow window for identifying a contribution, which has sometimes led to embarrassing awards for contributions that were later discredited. As a result of these experiences, the Nobel Committees now interpret “the preceding year” as the year when the full impact of the contribution has become evident.
So, in brief, a Nobel Prize in Bitcoin would recognize those who have conferred the greatest benefit to humanity in the area of bitcoin whose contribution has become evident in the preceding year.
I asked ChatGPT to flesh this out a bit. After some dialogue, I was a little concerned that ChatGPT would prioritize academic contributions. This seemed contrary to the ethos of bitcoin, where anyone can participate and contribute without any credentials whatsoever. We don’t even know who Satoshi is, much less care about his academic credentials. So I instructed ChatGPT to downplay academic criteria. These were the criteria we arrived at:
This seemed like a reasonable set of criteria for a Nobel Prize in Bitcoin—comprehensive enough to cover many different kinds of benefits to humanity and specific enough to focus in on concrete contributions.
Having agreed on the criteria for this prestigious award, I asked ChatGPT to name the recipient of the 2024 Nobel Prize in Bitcoin. If this had been a real Nobel Prize, that individual (or group of up to three individuals or an organization) would receive 11M Swedish kronor, which amounts to approximately $1M USD. Perhaps one day a Nobel Prize in Bitcoin will be established and the award will be paid in the money that most benefits humanity—bitcoin—in keeping with the principles of the award itself. For now we have to content ourselves with conferring honor and respect.
And the winner of the 2024 Nobel Prize in Bitcoin is…
Robin Linus (for his work on BitVM, pioneering the concept of trust-minimized rollups on bitcoin, expanding the possibilities of building securely on bitcoin without altering its core layer)
Here is some background ChatGPT gave on Robin Linus that provides a solid justification for this choice:
Linus seems like a logical choice, having catalyzed a massive resurgence of interest in development in the bitcoin ecosystem. The timing makes sense, since interest and activity surrounding Layer-2 solutions have taken a leap forward in the past year after the public announcement of BitVM.
Congratulations, Robin Linus! You are this year’s winner of the Nobel Prize in Bitcoin.
We couldn’t stop there, of course. I’m sure you’d like to know who won the award for previous years. So I asked ChatGPT to name those winners as well, along with the reason for the award. Here they are, beginning with the first award going to Satoshi in 2009:
If you’re like me, you probably see a few on this list that you disagree with and some others that you believe were overlooked. I decided not to tweak the criteria to fine-tune results that I liked. I figure that a real-world human committee would take a fairly broad view and would probably choose just as many controversial recipients as ChatGPT. So I leave it there.
What will happen in 2025 and beyond? Perhaps future awards will be given to developers of Layer-2 solutions like BitcoinOS or Ark that offer greater programmability and scalability. Maybe awards will recognize better strategies for custody or lower-friction onboarding that speed adoption to the masses. As bitcoin continues its journey toward global money and possibly a global reserve asset, it will become more evident that bitcoin will be a tremendous benefit to humanity. Perhaps a real-life Nobel Prize or something like it will be established to recognize the many heroes who will arise along this journey.